Search Results

Nancy Reagan

Early life

Anne Frances Robbins was born on July 6, 1921, at Manhattan’s Sloane Hospital for Women in New York, the only child of car salesman Kenneth Seymour Robbins (18941972) and his actress wife, Edith Luckett (18881987). Her godmother was silent-film-star Alla Nazimova. She lived for her first two years in Flushing, Queens, in New York. While her parents divorced soon after her birth, they had already been separated for some time. As her mother traveled the country to pursue acting jobs, Nancy was raised in Bethesda, Maryland, for the next six years by her aunt Virginia and uncle Audley Gailbraith. Nancy describes longing for her mother during those years: “My favorite times were when Mother had a job in New York, and Aunt Virgie would take me by train to stay with her.”

In 1929, her mother married Loyal Davis (18961982), a prominent, politically conservative neurosurgeon who moved the family to Chicago. Nancy and her stepfather got along very well; she would later write that he was “a man of great integrity who exemplified old-fashioned values”. He formally adopted her in 1935, and she would always refer to him as her father. At the time of the adoption, her name was legally changed to Nancy Davis (since birth, she had commonly been called Nancy). She attended the Girls’ Latin School of Chicago (describing herself as an average student), graduated in 1939, and later attended Smith College in Massachusetts, where she majored in English and drama and graduated in 1943.

Acting career

Nancy Davis poses for a publicity photo, 1950

Following her graduation, Davis held jobs in Chicago as a sales clerk in Marshall Field’s department store and as a nurse’s aide. With the help of her mother’s colleagues in theatre, including Zasu Pitts, Walter Huston, and Spencer Tracy, she pursued a career as a professional actress. She first gained a part in Pitts’ 1945 road tour of Ramshackle Inn, moving to New York City. She landed the role of Si-Tchun, a lady-in-waiting, in the 1946 Broadway musical about the Orient, Lute Song, starring Mary Martin and a pre-stardom Yul Brynner. The show’s producer told her, “You look like you could be Chinese.”

After passing a screen test, she moved to California and signed a seven-year contract with Metro Goldwyn Mayer Studios (MGM) in 1949; she later remarked, “Joining Metro was like walking into a dream world.” Davis appeared in 11 feature films, usually typecast as a “loyal housewife”, “responsible young mother”, or “the steady woman”. She kept her professional name as Nancy Davis even after marrying. Her film career began with minor roles in 1949′s The Doctor and the Girl with Glenn Ford, and followed with East Side, West Side starring Barbara Stanwyck. She played a child psychiatrist in the film noir Shadow on the Wall (1950) with Ann Sothern and Zachary Scott; her performance was called “beautiful and convincing” by New York Times critic A. H. Weiler. She co-starred in 1950′s The Next Voice You Hear…, playing a pregnant housewife who hears the voice of God from her radio. Influential reviewer Bosley Crowther of The New York Times wrote that “Nancy Davis [is] delightful as [a] gentle, plain, and understanding wife.” A later critic admired the film’s effort to convincingly portray Davis as pregnantany other films from the time neglected to do so. In 1951, Davis appeared in her favorite screen role, Night Into Morning, a study of bereavement starring Ray Milland. Crowther said that Davis “does nicely as the fiance who is widowed herself and knows the loneliness of grief,” while another noted critic, The Washington Post’s Richard L. Coe, said Davis “is splendid as the understanding widow.” Davis left MGM in 1952, seeking a broader range of parts. She soon starred in the 1953 science fiction film Donovan’s Brain; Crowther said that Davis, playing the role of a possessed scientist’s “sadly baffled wife”, “walked through it all in stark confusion” in an “utterly silly” film. In her last movie, Hellcats of the Navy (1957), she played nurse Lieutenant Helen Blair and shared the screen for the only time with her husband, playing what one critic called “a housewife who came along for the ride”. Another reviewer, however, stated that Davis plays her part well, and “does well with what she has to work with”.

Noted author Garry Wills believes that Davis was underrated as an actress overall, because her constrained part in Hellcats was her most widely seen performance. In addition, Davis downplayed her Hollywood goals: MGM promotional material in 1949 said that her “greatest ambition” was to have a “successful happy marriage”; decades later, in 1975, she would say, “I was never really a career woman but [became one] only because I hadn’t found the man I wanted to marry. I couldn’t sit around and do nothing, so I became an actress.” Ronald Reagan biographer Lou Cannon nevertheless characterized her as a “reliable” and “solid” performer who held her own in performances with better-known actors. After her final film, she appeared for a brief time in television dramas Wagon Train and The Tall Man until 1962, when she retired as an actress. During her career, she served on the board of directors of the Screen Actors Guild for nearly 10 years. Decades later, Albert Brooks attempted to coax Reagan out of acting retirement by offering her the title role opposite himself in his 1996 film Mother. Reagan declined in order to care for her husband, and Debbie Reynolds played the part.

Marriage and family

Newlyweds Ronald and Nancy Reagan, March 4, 1952

During her career as an actress, Nancy Davis dated actors in Hollywood; she later called Clark Gable, whom she dated briefly, the nicest of the stars she had met. On November 15, 1949, she met Ronald Reagan, who was then president of the Screen Actors Guild. Nancy had noticed that her name had appeared on the Hollywood blacklist and sought Reagan’s help to maintain her employment as a guild actress in Hollywood, and for assistance in having her name removed from the list. Reagan informed her that she had been confused with another actress of the same name. The two began dating and their relationship was the subject of many gossip columns; one Hollywood press account described their nightclub-free times together as “the romance of a couple who have no vices”. Ronald Reagan was skeptical about marriage, however, following his painful 1948 divorce from Jane Wyman, and he still saw other women. After three years of dating, he eventually proposed to Davis in the couple’s favorite booth at the Beverly Hills restaurant Chasen’s. They married on March 4, 1952 in a simple ceremony designed to avoid the press at the Little Brown Church in the San Fernando Valley of Los Angeles. The only people in attendance were actor William Holden, the best man, and his wife, the matron of honor. The couple’s first child, Patricia Ann Reagan (better known by her professional name, Patti Davis), was born on October 21, 1952. Their son, Ronald Prescott Reagan, was born six years later on May 20. Nancy Reagan also became stepmother to Maureen Reagan (19412001) and Michael Reagan (born 1945), the children of her husband’s first marriage to Jane Wyman.

Nancy and Ronald Reagan on a boat in 1964

The Reagan family in 1967, shortly after Ronald Reagan’s inauguration as Governor of California

Observers described Ronald and Nancy Reagan’s relationship as intimate. As president and first lady, the Reagans were reported to display their affection frequently, with one press secretary noting, “They never took each other for granted. They never stopped courting.” Ronald often called Nancy “Mommy”; she called him “Ronnie”. While the President was recuperating in the hospital after the 1981 assassination attempt, Nancy Reagan wrote in her diary, “Nothing can happen to my Ronnie. My life would be over.” In a letter to Nancy, Ronald wrote, “whatever I treasure and enjoy  all would be without meaning if I didn have you.” In 1998, while her husband was afflicted with Alzheimer’s disease, Nancy told Vanity Fair, “Our relationship is very special. We were very much in love and still are. When I say my life began with Ronnie, well, it’s true. It did. I can’t imagine life without him.” Nancy was known for the focused and attentive look, termed “the Gaze”, that she fastened upon her husband during his speeches and appearances. President Reagan’s death in June 2004 ended what Charlton Heston called “the greatest love affair in the history of the American Presidency.”

Nancy’s relationship with her children was not always as close as that with her husband; she frequently quarreled with her biological children and her stepchildren. Her relationship with Patti was the most contentious; Patti flouted American conservatism and rebelled against her parents by joining the nuclear freeze movement and authoring many anti-Reagan books. The nearly 20 years of family feuding left her very much estranged from both her mother and father. Soon after her father was diagnosed with Alzheimer’s disease, Patti and her mother reconciled and began to speak on a daily basis. Nancy’s disagreements with Michael were also public matters; in 1984, she was quoted as saying that the two were in an “estrangement right now”. Michael responded that Nancy was trying to cover up for the fact she had not met his daughter, Ashley, who had been born nearly a year earlier. They too eventually made peace. Nancy was thought to be closest to her stepdaughter Maureen during the White House years, but each of the Reagan children experienced periods of estrangement from their parents.

First Lady of California, 19671975

Nancy as the First Lady of California

Reagan was First Lady of California during her husband’s two terms as governor. She disliked living in Sacramento, which lacked the excitement, social life, and mild climate to which she was accustomed in Los Angeles. She first attracted controversy early in 1967, when, after four months’ residence in the California Governor’s Mansion in Sacramento, she moved her family into a wealthy suburb because fire officials had labeled the mansion as a “firetrap”. Though the Reagans leased the new house at their expense, the move was viewed by many as snobbish. Nancy defended her actions as being for the good of her family, a judgment with which her husband readily agreed. Friends of the family later helped support the cost of the leased house, while Nancy Reagan supervised construction of a new ranch-style governor’s residence in nearby Carmichael. The new residence was finished just as Ronald Reagan left office in 1975, but his successor, Jerry Brown, refused to live there. It was sold in 1982, and California governors have been living in improvised arrangements ever since.

In 1967 Nancy Reagan was appointed by her husband to the California Arts Commission, and a year later was named Los Angeles Times’ Woman of the Year; in its profile, the Times labeled her “A Model First Lady”. Her glamour, style, and youthfulness made her a frequent subject for press photographers. As first lady, Reagan visited veterans, the elderly, and the handicapped, and worked with a number of charities. She became quite involved with the Foster Grandparents Program, helping to popularize it in the United States, then in Australia. She later expanded her work with the organization after arriving in Washington, and wrote about her experiences in her 1982 book To Love a Child. The Reagans held dinners for former POWs and Vietnam War veterans while governor and first lady.

Role in 1976 and 1980 presidential campaigns

Main articles: United States presidential election, 1976 and United States presidential election, 1980

Governor Reagan’s term ended in 1975, and he did not run for a third; instead, he met with advisors to discuss a possible bid for the presidency in 1976, challenging incumbent President Gerald Ford. Reagan still needed to convince a reluctant Nancy before running, however. She feared for her husband’s health and his career as a whole, though she felt that he was the right man for the job and eventually approved. Nancy took on a more traditional role in the campaign, holding coffees, luncheons, and talks with senior citizens. With that, she oversaw personnel, monitored her husband’s schedule, and occasionally provided press conferences. The 1976 campaign included the so-called “battle of the queens”, contrasting Nancy with First Lady Betty Ford. They both spoke out over the course of the campaign on similar issues, but with different approaches. Nancy was particularly upset by the warmonger image that the Ford campaign had drawn of her husband.

Though he lost the 1976 Republican nomination, Reagan ran again for the presidency in 1980 and succeeded in winning the nomination and election. During this second campaign, Nancy played a very prominent role and her management of staff became more apparent. She arranged a meeting among feuding campaign managers John Sears and Michael Deaver and her husband, which resulted in Deaver leaving the campaign and Sears being given full control. After the Reagan camp lost the Iowa caucus and fell behind in New Hampshire polls, Nancy organized a second meeting and decided it was time to fire Sears and his associates; she gave Sears a copy of the press release announcing his dismissal. Her influence on her husband became particularly notable; her presence at rallies, luncheons, and receptions increased his confidence.

First Lady of the United States, 19811989

First Lady Nancy Reagan and President Reagan during the inaugural parade, 1981

White House glamour

Renovation

Nancy Reagan became the First Lady of the United States when Ronald Reagan was inaugurated as president in January 1981. Early in her husband’s presidency, Reagan stated her desire to create a more suitable “first home” in the White House, as the building had fallen into a state of disrepair following years of neglect. White House aide Michael Deaver described the second and third floor family residence as having “cracked plaster walls, chipped paint [and] beaten up floors;” rather than use government funds to renovate and redecorate, she sought private donations. Nancy directed a major renovation of several White House rooms, including all of the second and third floors and rooms adjacent to the Oval Office, including the press briefing room. The renovation included repainting walls, refinishing floors, repairing fireplaces, and replacing antique pipes, windows, and wires. The closet in the master bedroom was converted into a beauty parlor and dressing room, and the West bedroom was made into a small gymnasium.

The first lady secured the assistance of renowned interior designer Ted Graber, popular with affluent West Coast social figures, to redecorate the family living quarters. A Chinese-pattern, handpainted wallpaper was added to the master bedroom. Family furniture was placed in the president’s private study. The first lady and her designer retrieved a number of White House antiques, which had been in storage, and placed them throughout the mansion.

The extensive redecoration was paid for by private donations. Many significant and long-lasting changes occurred as a result of the renovation and refurbishment, of which Nancy Reagan said, “This house belongs to all Americans, and I want it to be something of which they can be proud.”

Fashion

The new first lady in her inaugural attire, 1981

Another of Nancy Reagan’s trademarks was her interest in fashion. While her husband was still president-elect, press reports speculated about Nancy’s social life and interest in fashion. In many press accounts, Nancy’s sense of style was favorably compared to that of previous First Lady Jacqueline Kennedy. Friends and those close to her remarked that, while fashionable like Kennedy, she would be different than other first ladies; close friend Harriet Deutsch was quoted as saying, “Nancy has her own imprint.”

Nancy Reagan’s wardrobe consisted of dresses, gowns, and suits made by luxury designers, including James Galanos, Bill Blass, Adolfo, and Oscar de la Renta. Her white, hand-beaded, one shoulder Galanos 1981 inaugural gown was estimated to cost ,000 while the overall price of her inaugural wardrobe was said to cost ,000. She favored the color red, calling it “a picker-upper”, and wore it accordingly. Her wardrobe included red so often, that the fire-engine shade became known as “Reagan red”. She employed two private hairdressers that would style her hair on a regular basis in the White House.

Reagan models for Vogue magazine in the Red Room, 1981

Fashion designers were pleased with the emphasis Nancy Reagan placed on clothing. Adolfo said the first lady embodied an “elegant, affluent, well-bred, chic American look,” while Bill Blass commented, “I don’t think there’s been anyone in the White House since Jacqueline Kennedy Onassis who has her flair.” William Fine, president of cosmetic company Frances Denney, noted that she “stays in style, but she doesn’t become trendy.”

Though her elegant fashions and wardrobe were hailed as a “glamourous paragon of chic”, they were also controversial subjects. In 1982, she revealed that she had accepted thousands of dollars in clothing, jewelry, and other gifts, but defended her actions by stating that she had borrowed the clothes and that they would either be returned or donated to museums, and that she was promoting the American fashion industry. Facing criticism, she soon said she would no longer accept such loans. While often buying her clothes, she continued to borrow and sometimes keep designer clothes throughout her time as first lady, which came to light in 1988. None of this had been included on financial disclosure forms; the non-reporting of loans under ,000 in liability was in violation of a voluntary agreement the White House had made in 1982, while not reporting more valuable loans or clothes not returned was a possible violation of the Ethics in Government Act. Nancy expressed through her press secretary “regrets that she failed to heed counsel’s advice” on disclosing them.

Despite the controversy, many designers who allowed her to borrow clothing noted that the arrangement was good for their businesses as well as for the American fashion industry overall. In 1989, Nancy was honored at the annual gala awards dinner of the Council of Fashion Designers of America, during which she received the council’s lifetime achievement award. Barbara Walters said of her, “She has served every day for eight long years the word ‘style.’”

Elegance and formality

Approximately a year into her husband’s first term, Nancy Reagan explored the idea of ordering new state china service for the White House. A full china service had not been purchased since the Truman administration in the 1940s, as only a partial service was ordered in the Johnson administration. She was quoted as saying, “The White House really badly, badly needs china.” Working with Lenox, the primary porcelain manufacturer in America, the first lady chose a design scheme of a red with etched gold band, bordering the scarlet and cream colored ivory plates with a raised presidential seal etched in gold in the center. The full service comprised 4,370 pieces, with 19 pieces per individual set. The service totaled 9,508. Although it was paid for by private donations, some from the private Knapp Foundation, the purchase generated quite a controversy, for it was ordered at a time when the nation was undergoing an economic recession.

The new china, White House renovations, expensive clothing, and her attendance at the wedding of Charles and Diana, Prince and Princess of Wales, gave her an aura of being “out of touch” with the American people during an economic recession. This and her taste for splendor inspired the derogatory nickname “Queen Nancy”. While Jacqueline Kennedy had also faced some press criticism for her spending habits, Reagan’s treatment was much more consistent and negative. In an attempt to deflect the criticism, she self-deprecatingly donned a baglady costume at the 1982 Gridiron Dinner and sang “Second-Hand Clothes”, mimicking the song “Second-Hand Rose”. The skit helped to restore her reputation.

Reagan and her husband with her predecessor as First Lady, Jackie Kennedy, widow of President Kennedy, in 1985. Nancy and Jackie were often compared due to their glamour, in contrast to the intervening First Ladies.

Nancy Reagan reflected on the criticisms in her 1989 autobiography, My Turn. Reagan describes lunching with former Democratic National Committee chairman Robert Strauss, wherein Strauss said to her, “When you first came to town, Nancy, I didn’t like you at all. But after I got to know you, I changed my mind and said, ‘She’s some broad!’” Nancy responded, “Bob, based on the press reports I read then, I wouldn’t have liked me either!”

After the presidencies of Gerald Ford (who favored the Michigan fight song over “Hail to the Chief”) and Jimmy Carter (who dramatically reduced the formality of presidential functions), Nancy brought a Kennedy-esque glamour back into the White House. She hosted 56 state dinners over eight years, compared to six by George and Laura Bush. She remarked that hosting the dinners is “the easiest thing in the world. You don’t have to do anything. Just have a good time and do a little business. And that’s the way Washington works.” In 1987, Mikhail Gorbachev became the first Soviet leader to visit Washington, D.C. since Nikita Khrushchev in 1959, and Nancy Reagan was in charge of planning and hosting the important and highly anticipated state dinner. After the meal, Nancy recruited pianist Van Cliburn to sing a rendition of “Moscow Nights” for the Soviet delegation, to which Mikhail and Raisa broke out into song. Former Secretary of State George Shultz commented on the evening, saying “We felt the ice of the Cold War crumbling.” Nancy concluded, “It was a perfect ending for one of the great evenings of my husband’s presidency.”

Just Say No

Main article: Just Say No

Nancy Reagan launched the “Just Say No” drug awareness campaign in 1982, which was her primary project and major initiative as first lady. Nancy first became aware of the need to educate young people about drugs during a 1980 campaign stop in Daytop Village, New York. She remarked in 1981 that “Understanding what drugs can do to your children, understanding peer pressure and understanding why they turn to drugs is… the first step in solving the problem.” Her campaign focused on drug education and informing the youth of the danger of drug abuse.

Reagan gives a speech at a Just Say No rally in Los Angeles, 1987

In 1982, Nancy Reagan was asked by a schoolgirl what to do when offered drugs; Nancy responded “Just say no.” The phrase proliferated in the popular culture of the 1980s and was eventually adopted as the name of club organizations and school anti-drug programs. Reagan became actively involved by traveling more than 250,000 miles (400,000 km) throughout the United States and several nations, visiting drug abuse prevention programs and drug rehabilitation centers. She also appeared on television talk shows, recorded public service announcements, and wrote guest articles. She appeared in an episode of the hit television drama Dynasty to underscore support for the anti-drug campaign. As she continued to promote “Just Say No”, she appeared in an episode of the popular 1980s sitcom Diff’rent Strokes and in a 1985 rock music video, “Stop the Madness”. When asked about her campaign, the first lady remarked, “If you can save just one child, it’s worth it.”

In 1985, Nancy expanded the campaign to an international level by inviting the First Ladies of various nations to the White House for a conference on drug abuse. On October 27, 1986, President Reagan signed a drug enforcement bill into law, which granted .7 billion in funding to fight the crisis and ensured a mandatory minimum penalty for drug offenses. Although the bill was criticized by some, Nancy Reagan considered it a personal victory. In 1988, she became the first First Lady invited to address the United Nations General Assembly, where she spoke on international drug interdiction and trafficking laws.

Reagan hosts the First Ladies Conference on Drug Abuse at the White House, 1985.

Critics of Reagan’s efforts questioned their purpose and argued that the program did not go far enough in addressing many social issues, including unemployment, poverty, and family dissolution; Nancy’s approach to promoting drug awareness was labeled as simplistic by liberal critics. Nonetheless, a number of “Just Say No” clubs and organizations remain in operation around the country, and they aim to educate children and teenagers about the effects of drugs.

Her husband’s protector

Nancy Reagan assumed the role of unofficial “protector” for her husband after the attempted assassination on his life in 1981. On March 30 of that year, President Reagan and three others were shot as they left the Washington Hilton Hotel. Nancy was alerted and arrived at George Washington University Hospital, where the President was hospitalized. She recalled having seen “emergency rooms before, but I had never seen one like thisith my husband in it.” She was escorted into a waiting room, and when granted access to see her husband, he quipped to her, “Honey, I forgot to duck”, borrowing the defeated boxer Jack Dempsey’s jest to his wife.

An early example of her protective nature occurred when Senator Strom Thurmond entered the President’s hospital room that day in March, passing the Secret Service detail by claiming he was the President’s “close friend”, presumably to acquire media attention. Nancy was outraged and demanded he leave. While the president recuperated in the hospital, the first lady slept with one of his shirts to be comforted by the scent. When Reagan was released from the hospital on April 12, she escorted him back to the White House.

Press accounts framed Nancy as her husband’s “chief protector”, an extension of their general initial framing of her as a helpmate and a Cold War domestic ideal.

Influence in the White House

“The Gaze”: Nancy watches as her husband is sworn in for a second term by Chief Justice Warren Burger, on January 20, 1985.

Nancy stated in her memoirs, “I felt panicky every time [Ronald] left the White House” following the assassination attempt, and made it her concern to know her husband’s schedule: the events he would be attending, and with whom. Eventually, this protectiveness led to her consulting an astrologer, Joan Quigley, who offered insight on which days were “good”, “neutral”, or should be avoided, which influenced her husband’s White House schedule. Days were color-coded according to the astrologer’s advice to discern precisely which days and times would be optimal for the president’s safety and success. The White House Chief of Staff, Donald Regan, grew frustrated with this regimen, which created friction between him and the First Lady. This escalated with the revelation of the Iran-Contra affair, an administration scandal, in which the First Lady felt Regan was damaging the president. She thought he should resign, and expressed this to her husband although he did not share her view. Regan wanted President Reagan to address the Iran-Contra matter in early 1987 by means of a press conference, though Nancy refused to allow Reagan to overexert himself due to a recent prostate surgery and astrological warnings. Regan became so angry with Nancy that he hung up on her during a 1987 telephone conversation. According to former ABC News correspondent Sam Donaldson, when the President heard of this treatment, he demandednd eventually receivedegan’s resignation. In his 1988 memoirs, Regan wrote about Nancy’s consultations with the astrologer, the first public mention of them, which resulted in embarrassment for the First Lady. Nancy later wrote, “Astrology was simply one of the ways I coped with the fear I felt after my husband almost died… Was astrology one of the reasons [further attempts did not occur]? I don’t really believe it was, but I don’t really believe it wasn’t.”

The Reagans talk in the Oval Office, 1985

Nancy Reagan wielded a powerful influence over President Reagan. Again stemming from the assassination attempt, she strictly controlled access to the president and even occasionally attempted to influence her husband’s decision making.

Beginning in 1985, Nancy strongly encouraged her husband to hold “summit” conferences with Soviet General Secretary Gorbachev, and suggested they form a personal relationship beforehand. Both Ronald Reagan and Mikhail Gorbachev had developed a productive relationship through their summit negotiations. The relationship between Nancy Reagan and Raisa Gorbachev was anything but the friendly, diplomatic one between their husbands; Nancy found Raisa hard to converse with and their relationship was described as “frosty”. The two women usually had tea, and discussed differences between the USSR and the United States. Visiting the U.S. for the first time in 1987, Raisa irked Reagan with lectures on subjects ranging from architecture to socialism, reportedly prompting the American President’s wife to quip, “Who does that dame think she is?”

Press framing of Nancy changed from that of just helpmate and protector to someone with hidden power. As the image of her as a political interloper grew, she sought to explicitly deny that she was the power behind the throne. At the end of her time as First Lady, however, she said that her husband had not been well-served by his staff. She acknowledged her role in reaction in influencing him on personnel decisions, saying “In no way do I apologize for it.” She wrote in her memoirs, “I don’t think I was as bad, or as extreme in my power or my weakness, as I was depicted,” but went on, “[H]owever the first lady fits in, she has a unique and important role to play in looking after her husband. And it’s only natural that she’ll let him know what she thinks. I always did that for Ronnie, and I always will.”

Breast cancer

In October 1987, a mammogram detected a lesion in Nancy Reagan’s left breast and she was subsequently diagnosed with breast cancer. She chose to undergo a mastectomy rather than a lumpectomy and the breast was removed on October 17, 1987. Not long after the operation, her mother, Edith Luckett Davis, died in Phoenix, Arizona, leading Nancy to dub the period “a terrible month”.

After the surgery, more women across the country had mammograms, an example of the influence the first lady possesses.

Later life

Though Nancy was a controversial First Lady, 56 percent of Americans had a favorable opinion of her when her husband left office on January 20, 1989, with 18 percent having an unfavorable opinion and the balance not giving an opinion. Compared to fellow First Ladies when their husbands left office, Reagan’s approval was higher than those of Rosalynn Carter and Hillary Rodham Clinton, however she was less popular than Barbara Bush and her disapproval rating was double that of Carter’s.

Nancy Reagan’s official White House portrait hangs in the Vermeil Room.

Upon leaving the White House, the couple returned to California, where they purchased a home in the Bel Air section of Los Angeles, dividing their time between Bel Air and the Reagan Ranch in Santa Barbara, California; Ronald and Nancy regularly attended Bel Air Presbyterian Church as well. After leaving Washington, Nancy made numerous public appearances, many on behalf of her husband. She continues to reside at the Bel Air home, where she lived with her husband until his death on June 5, 2004.

Early post-White House activities

In late 1989, the former First Lady established the Nancy Reagan Foundation, which aimed to continue to educate people about the dangers of substance abuse. The Foundation teamed with the BEST Foundation For A Drug-Free Tomorrow in 1994, and developed the Nancy Reagan Afterschool Program. She continued to travel around the nation, speaking out against drug and alcohol abuse. After President Reagan revealed that he had been diagnosed with Alzheimer’s disease in 1994, she made herself his primary caregiver and became actively involved with the National Alzheimer’s Association and its affiliate, the Ronald and Nancy Reagan Research Institute in Chicago, Illinois.

Ronnie’s long journey has finally taken him to a distant place where I can no longer reach him.

ancy Reagan, May 2004

Also in 1989 she published My Turn: The Memoirs of Nancy Reagan, which gives an account of her life in the White House, speaking openly about her influence within the Reagan administration and discussing the myths and controversies that surrounded the couple. In 1991, the controversial author Kitty Kelley wrote an unauthorized and largely uncited biography about Nancy Reagan, repeating accounts of a poor relationship with her children and introducing rumors of alleged sexual relations with singer Frank Sinatra. A wide range of sources commented that Kelley’s largely unsupported claims are most likely false.

In 1989 the Internal Revenue Service began investigating the Reagans for whether they owed additional tax on the gifts and loans of high-fashion clothes and jewelry to Nancy during their time in the White House (recipients benefiting from the display of such items recognize taxable income even if they are returned). In 1992 the IRS determined the Reagans had failed to include some million worth of fashion items between 1983 and 1988 on their tax returns; they were billed for a large amount of back taxes and interest, which was subsequently paid.

Nancy Reagan was awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom, the nation’s highest civilian honor, by President George W. Bush on July 9, 2002. President Reagan received his own Presidential Medal of Freedom in January 1993. Nancy and her husband were jointly awarded the Congressional Gold Medal on May 16, 2002 at the Capitol, and were only the third President and First Lady to receive it; she accepted the medal on behalf of both of them.

Ronald Reagan’s funeral

Former First Lady Nancy Reagan says her last goodbye to President Ronald Reagan on June 11, 2004, prior to the interment and concluding a week-long state funeral for the president.

Further information: Death and state funeral of Ronald Reagan

Ronald Reagan died in their Bel Air home on June 5, 2004. During the seven-day state funeral, Nancy, accompanied by her children and military escort, led the nation in mourning by keeping a strong composure, traveling from her home to the Reagan Library for a memorial service, then to Washington, D.C., where her husband’s body lay in state for 34 hours prior to a national funeral service in the Washington National Cathedral. She returned to the library in California for a sunset memorial service and interment, where, overcome with emotion, she lost her composure, crying in public for the first time during the week. After accepting the folded flag, she kissed the casket and mouthed “I love you” before leaving. Journalist Wolf Blitzer said of Reagan during the week, “She’s a very, very strong woman, even though she looks frail.”

She had directed the detailed planning of the funeral, including ordering all the major events and asking former President George H. W. Bush as well as former British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher and former Canadian Prime Minister Brian Mulroney to speak during the National Cathedral Service. She paid very close attention to the details, something she had always done in her husband’s life. Betsy Bloomingdale, one of Reagan’s closest friends, stated, “She looks a little frail. But she is very strong inside. She is. She has the strength. She is doing her last thing for Ronnie. And she is going to get it right.” The funeral marked Reagan’s first major public appearance since delivering a speech to the 1996 Republican National Convention on her husband’s behalf.

The funeral had a great impact on Reagan’s public image. Following substantial criticism during her tenure as first lady, she was seen somewhat as a national heroine, praised by many for supporting and caring for her husband while he suffered from Alzheimer’s disease. U.S. News & World Report opined, “after a decade in the shadows, a different, softer Nancy Reagan emerged.”

Life after Ronald

Reagan has remained active in politics, particularly relating to stem cell research. Beginning in 2004, she favored what many consider to be the Democratic Party’s position, and urged President George W. Bush to support federally funded embryonic stem cell research in the hope that this science could lead to a cure for Alzheimer’s disease. Although she failed to change the president’s position, she did support his campaign for a second term.

In 2005, Reagan was honored at a gala dinner at the Ronald Reagan Building in Washington, D.C. where guests included Dick Cheney, Harry Reid and Condoleezza Rice. It was her first major public appearance since the funeral. Asked what her future plans were, Reagan shook her head and responded, “I don’t know. I’ll know when I’ll know. But the [Reagan] library is Ronnie, so that’s where I spend my time.”

Nancy Reagan dedicates the Air Force One Pavilion at the Reagan Library with President and Laura Bush, October 2005

In 2007, she attended the national funeral service for Gerald Ford in the Washington National Cathedral. Nancy Reagan hosted two 2008 Republican Presidential Candidates Debates at the Reagan Presidential Library, the first in May 2007 and the second in January 2008. While she did not participate in the discussions, she sat in the front row and listened as the men vying to become the nation’s 44th president claimed to be a rightful successor to her husband. Though some speculation arose as to whether Reagan might support New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg in a presidential bid, nothing came of it. She formally endorsed Senator John McCain, then the presumptive Republican party nominee, for president on March 25.

Nancy Reagan, center, receives an honorary degree from Eureka College, March 31, 2009

Nancy Reagan and one of her successors, Michelle Obama, at a luncheon, June 3, 2009

She attended the funeral of Lady Bird Johnson in Austin, Texas on July 14, 2007 and three days later accepted the highest Polish distinction, the Order of the White Eagle, on behalf of Ronald Reagan at the Reagan Library. The Reagan Library opened the temporary exhibit “Nancy Reagan: A First Lady’s Style”, which displayed over eighty designer dresses belonging to the first lady.

Nancy Reagan’s health and well being became a prominent concern in 2008. In February she suffered a fall at her Bel Air home and was taken to St. John’s Health Center in Santa Monica, California. Doctors reported that she did not break a hip as feared and she was released from the hospital two days later. News commentators noted that Reagan’s step had slowed significantly, as the following month she walked in very slow strides with John McCain. NBC’s Brian Williams, who attended a dinner with Reagan in mid-2008, recalled, “Mrs. Reagan’s vision isn’t what it always was so she was taking very halting steps as a lot of folks her age do… [I]t is so important for folks in her age bracket and in her bracket of life to remain upright and captain of their own ship. She very much is captain of her own ship.” As for her mental ability, Williams remarked, “She’s as sharp as ever and enjoys a robust life with her friends in California, but [falling] is always a danger of course. She’s a very stoic, hardy person full of joy and excitement for life… She is not without opinions on politics and political types these days… She is, as most of her friends described her, a pistol.”

In October 2008, Reagan was admitted to Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center after having fallen at home; doctors determined that the 87-year-old had fractured her pelvis and sacrum and could recuperate at home with a regimen of physical therapy. As a result of her mishap, medical articles were published containing information on how to prevent falls. In January 2009, Reagan was said to be “improving every day and starting to get out more and more.”

In March 2009 she praised President Barack Obama for reversing the ban on federally funded embryonic stem cell research. She traveled to Washington, D.C. in June 2009 to unveil a statue of her late husband in the Capitol Rotunda. She was also on hand as President Obama signed the Ronald Reagan Centennial Commission Act and lunched privately with Michelle Obama. Nancy revealed in an interview with Vanity Fair that Michelle Obama had telephoned her for advice on living and entertaining in the White House. Following the August 2009 death of Senator Edward M. Kennedy, she said she was “terribly saddened … Given our political differences, people are sometimes surprised how close Ronnie and I have been to the Kennedy family. … I will miss him.”

Filmography

The Doctor and the Girl (1949)

East Side, West Side (1949)

Shadow on the Wall (1950)

The Next Voice You Hear… (1950)

Night Into Morning (1951)

It’s a Big Country (1951)

Talk About a Stranger (1952)

Shadow in the Sky (1952)

Donovan’s Brain (1953)

Rescue at Sea (also known as Crash Landing1955)

The Dark Wave (1956)

Hellcats of the Navy (1957)

Footnotes

^ a b Edith Luckett at Internet Movie Database

^ a b Edith Luckett at Internet Broadway Database

^ a b c d e “Nancy Reagan > Her Life & Times”. Ronald Reagan Presidential Foundation. http://www.reaganlibrary.com/reagan/nancy/nancy_bio.asp. Retrieved 2007-09-22. 

^ When Nancy Davis signed with MGM, she gave her birthdate as July 6, 1923, shaving two years off her age, a common practice in Hollywood (see Cannon, Governor Reagan, p. 75). This caused subsequent confusion as some sources would continue to use the incorrect birth year.

^ Powling, Anne; John O’Connor, Geoff Barton (1997). New Oxford English. Oxford University Press. ISBN 0198311923.  p. 79

^ Some sources and websites erroneously list her as either being born in Flushing or being raised in Manhattan.

^ Reagan, Nancy (1989), p. 66

^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t “First Lady Biography: Nancy Reagan”. National First Ladies Library. http://www.firstladies.org/biographies/firstladies.aspx?biography=41. Retrieved 2007-06-02. 

^ Wills (1987), p. 182

^ David Gonzalez (1991-04-12). “Talk and More Talk About Nancy (That One!) in Flushing”. New York Times. http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9D0CE7DE123CF931A25757C0A967958260. Retrieved 2007-10-29. 

^ a b Reagan, Nancy (1989), p. 67

^ “The ‘just say no’ first lady”. MSNBC. February 18, 2004. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4297405. Retrieved 2007-10-16. 

^ Reagan, Nancy (1989), p. 71

^ a b c d e f Lally Weymouth (1980-10-26). “The Biggest Role of Nancy’s Life” (fee required). The New York Times Magazine. http://select.nytimes.com/mem/archive/pdf?res=F70F1FF9395C17728DDDAF0A94D8415B8084F1D3. Retrieved 2007-10-20. 

^ Reagan, Nancy (1989), p. 74

^ Reagan, Nancy (1989), p. 82

^ “Lute Song”. Internet Broadway Database. http://www.ibdb.com/production.php?id=1771. Retrieved 2007-10-18. 

^ Reagan, Nancy (1989), p. 85

^ Reagan, Nancy (1989), p. 88

^ “Biography for Nancy Davis”. Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. 2007. http://www.tcm.com/tcmdb/participant.jsp?participantId=45332. Retrieved 2007-10-17. 

^ a b c d e Cannon, Lou (2003), pp. 7576

^ a b c “Nancy Reagan > Her Films”. Ronald Reagan Foundation. http://www.reaganfoundation.org/reagan/nancy/films.asp. Retrieved 2007-03-08. 

^ A. H. Weiler (credited as “A. W.”) (1950-05-19). “Another View of Psychiatrist’s Task”. The New York Times. http://select.nytimes.com/mem/archive/pdf?res=F70F1FF83E5D147B93CBA8178ED85F448585F9. Retrieved 2007-10-18. 

^ Bosley Crowther (1950-06-30). “‘The Next Voice You Hear …’, Dore Schary Production, Opens at Music Hall”. The New York Times. http://select.nytimes.com/mem/archive/pdf?res=FB0B14F93D5C127A93C2AA178DD85F448585F9. Retrieved 2007-10-18. 

^ Sindelar, Dave. “The Next Voice You Hear… (1950)”. SciFilm. http://www.toptenreviews.com/scripts/eframe/url.htm?u=http://www.scifilm.org/musings2/musing822.html. Retrieved 2007-10-17. 

^ Reagan, Nancy (1989), p. 91

^ Bosley Crowther (1951-06-11). “‘Night Into Morning,’ Starring Ray Milland as a Bereaved Professor, at Loew’s State”. The New York Times. http://select.nytimes.com/mem/archive/pdf?res=FA081EFA3855177B93C3A8178DD85F458585F9. Retrieved 2007-10-18. 

^ Richard L. Coe (1951-06-09). “‘Night Into Morning’ Is Almost Excellent” (fee required). The Washington Post. http://proquest.umi.com/pdf/fa58d77382f20db57572666f678f207a/1202604554/share2/pqimage/hnirs3/20080209191917226/27518/out.pdf. Retrieved 2008-02-09. 

^ Wills (1987), p. 184.

^ Bosley Crowther (1954-01-21). “‘ Donovan’s Brain,’ Science-Fiction Thriller, Has Premiere at the Criterion Theatre”. The New York Times. http://select.nytimes.com/mem/archive/pdf?res=F00A12FC3A5A117A93C3AB178AD85F408585F9. Retrieved 2007-10-20. 

^ Erickson, Glenn (2003). “Hellcats of the Navy, review one”. Kleinman.com Inc. http://www.toptenreviews.com/scripts/eframe/url.htm?u=http://www.dvdtalk.com/dvdsavant/s808hell.html. Retrieved 2007-10-17. 

^ Harper, Erick (2003). “Hellcats Of The Navy, review two”. DVDVerdict. http://www.dvdverdict.com/reviews/hellcatsnavy.php. Retrieved 2007-10-17. 

^ “Screen Actors Guild Presidents”. Screen Actors Guild. http://www.sag.org/ronald-reagan. Retrieved 2007-03-08. 

^ a b Lambert, Pat (1997-01-27). “To The Top”. People. http://www.albertbrooks.com/articles/peoplemag97.html. Retrieved 2009-05-14. 

^ a b c d e Cannon, Lou (2003), pp. 7778

^ “Noteworthy places in Reagan’s life”. The Baltimore Sun. 2004-06-05. http://www.baltimoresun.com/sports/golf/sns-ap-reagan-places,0,1844441.story?page=2. Retrieved 2007-04-11. 

^ “First Ladies: Nancy Reagan”. The White House. http://www.whitehouse.gov/history/firstladies/nr40.html. Retrieved 2007-03-08. 

^ Beschloss, Michael (2007), p. 296

^ a b c d “End of a Love Story”. BBC News. June 5, 2004. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/265714.stm. Retrieved 2007-03-21. 

^ a b Berry, Deborah Barfield (June 6, 2004). “By Reagan’s Side, but her own person”. Newsday. http://www.newsday.com/news/nationworld/nation/ny-usnanc063835985jun06,0,3872519.story?coll=ny-nationalnews-headlines. Retrieved 2007-08-15. 

^ a b c Beschloss, Michael (2007), p. 284

^ “Reagan Love Story”. NBC News. June 9, 2004. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4201869/. Retrieved 2007-05-25. 

^ “Up Next for Nancy Reagan: tending her Ronnie’s flame”. St. Petersburg Times. June 13, 2004. http://www.sptimes.com/2004/06/13/Worldandnation/Up_next_for_Nancy_Rea.shtml. Retrieved 2007-03-08. 

^ Wolf, Julie (2000). “The Reagan Children”. PBS. http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/amex/reagan/peopleevents/pande05.html. Retrieved 2007-10-17. 

^ Couric, Katie (November 14, 2004). “Reagan daughter shares her story”. MSNBC. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6478080/. Retrieved 2009-06-04. 

^ “Road To A Reconciliation”. CBS. March 27, 2009. http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/03/27/sunday/main4898395.shtml?source=RSS&attr=_4898395. Retrieved 2009-06-04. 

^ Reagan, Nancy (1989), pp. 148149

^ a b c Cannon, Lou (2003), p. 233

^ a b Reagan, Nancy (1989), pp. 135137

^ a b Charlie LeDuff (2004-11-19). “Forget the White House, Schwarzenegger Needs Digs Now”. The New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2004/11/19/national/19mansion.html. Retrieved 2007-10-19. 

^ Robert_Windeler (1967-11-17). “Reagan Panel Fills Arts Chief’s Post After It Ousted Aide”. The New York Times. http://select.nytimes.com/mem/archive/pdf?res=F1071FF93D5E1A718DDDAE0994D9415B878AF1D3. Retrieved 2007-10-18. 

^ Lynn Lilliston (1968-12-13). “A Model First Lady”. Los Angeles Times. http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/latimes/access/527764082.html?dids=527764082:527764082&FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:AI&type=historic&date=Dec+13,+1968&author=LYNN+LILLISTON&pub=Los+Angeles+Times+(1886-Current+File)&edition;=&startpage=F1&desc=TIMES+WOMAN+OF+THE+YEAR. Retrieved 2007-10-19. 

^ Cook, Lynn and Janet LaDue (2007), pp. 110111

^ “Medal of Freedom Recipients: Nancy Reagan”. medaloffreedom.com. http://www.medaloffreedom.com/NancyReagan.htm. Retrieved 2007-03-08. 

^ a b “Foster Grandparent’s Program”. Scholastic. http://www2.scholastic.com/browse/article.jsp?id=4649. Retrieved 2007-03-08. 

^ Anthony, C.S. (2003), p. 135

^ Samantha Jonas (2004-06-05). “Bio: Nancy Reagan”. Fox News. http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,63814,00.html. Retrieved 2007-10-19. 

^ Timberg, Robert (1999). John McCain: An American Odyssey. Touchstone Books. ISBN 0-684-86794-X.  pp. 119121

^ Benze, James G. (2005), p. 32

^ a b c Loizeau, P.M. (2004), p. 64

^ a b c Benze, James G., Jr. (2005), p. 33

^ Loizeau, P.M. (2004), p. 65

^ Loizeau, P.M. (2004), p. 69

^ a b Wolf, Julie.. “The American Experience: Nancy Reagan”. PBS. http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/amex/reagan/peopleevents/pande03.html. Retrieved 2008-01-22. 

^ a b Deaver, Michael (2004), p. 78

^ “Nancy Reagan”. The White House Historical Association. http://www.whitehousehistory.org/05/subs/05_b20.html. Retrieved 2008-02-01. 

^ “Brady Press Briefing Room”. The White House Museum. http://www.whitehousemuseum.org/west-wing/press-briefing-room.htm. Retrieved 2008-02-01. 

^ “West Bedroom”. The White House Museum. http://www.whitehousemuseum.org/floor2/west-bedroom.htm. Retrieved 2008-02-01. 

^ a b c d e Nemy, Enid (June 12, 2000). “Ted Graber, 80, Decorator for Reagans, Dies”. The New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2000/06/12/us/ted-graber-80-decorator-for-reagans-dies.html. Retrieved 2009-07-21. 

^ “Master Bedroom”. The White House Museum. http://www.whitehousemuseum.org/floor2/master-bedroom.htm. Retrieved 2008-02-01. 

^ Jacobs, Jody (November 9, 1980). “Nancy Reagan: “She’ll Bring Style”". The Toledo Blade (Google News Archives). http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=HREVAAAAIBAJ&sjid=MQMEAAAAIBAJ&dq=nancy reagan fashion&pg=7183,413166. Retrieved 2009-07-22. 

^ a b Nemy, Enid (November 11, 1980). “Nancy Reagan’s White House: what’s ahead?”. The New York Times published in The Pittsburgh Post-Gazette (Google News Archives). http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=v08NAAAAIBAJ&sjid=yG0DAAAAIBAJ&dq=nancy reagan fashion&pg=7004,1576501. Retrieved 2009-07-22. 

^ Proven, Grace (December 23, 1980). “Fashion Designers Look Ahead to ’81″. The Pittsburgh Post-Gazette (Google News Archives). http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=XlANAAAAIBAJ&sjid=yW0DAAAAIBAJ&dq=nancy reagan fashion&pg=5805,4581550. Retrieved 2009-07-22. 

^ a b Burns, Lisa (2008), p. 148

^ a b c d West, Kevin (October 2007). “Nancy’s Closet”. W. http://www.wmagazine.com/society/2007/10/nancy_reagan. Retrieved 2009-05-15. 

^ a b c d e f Bennetts, Leslie (January 25, 1981). “Nancy Reagan’s inaugural wardrobe gives notice of new White House opulence”. The New York Times published in the St. Petersburg Times (Google News Archives). http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=GPALAAAAIBAJ&sjid=JloDAAAAIBAJ&dq=nancy reagan fashion&pg=6776,893022. Retrieved 2009-07-22. 

^ Stevens, Dana (February 6, 2008). “Color Me Nancy Reagan Red”. Slate.com. http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2008/02/06/color-me-nancy-reagan-red.aspx. Retrieved 2008-06-18. 

^ King, Wayne and Warren Weaver, Jr. (August 23, 1986). “Washington Talk: Briefing; A Do Ado”. http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9A0DE0D81338F930A1575BC0A960948260. Retrieved 2008-06-18. 

^ “For Mrs. Reagan, Gifts Mean High Fashion At No Cost” (fee required). Associated Press for The New York Times. 1982-01-16. http://select.nytimes.com/search/restricted/article?res=F60716FA3A5C0C758DDDA80894DA484D81. Retrieved 2008-02-01. 

^ a b Hedrick Smith (1982-02-17). “Nancy Reagan Gives Up Dress Designer Loans” (fee required). The New York Times. http://select.nytimes.com/search/restricted/article?res=F30912F9395F0C748DDDAB0894DA484D81. Retrieved 2008-02-01. 

^ a b c d Ed Magnuson (1988-10-24). “Why Mrs. Reagan Still Looks Like a Million”. Time. http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,968774-1,00.html. Retrieved 2008-02-01. 

^ Kurtz, Howard (1989-12-05). “IRS Looking Into Gifts To Reagans; Borrowed Designer Dresses Subject of Tax Inquiry” (fee required). The Washington Post. http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P2-1226713.html. Retrieved 2008-02-02. 

^ a b Steven V. Roberts (1988-10-18). “First Lady Expresses ‘Regrets’ on Wardrobe”. The New York Times. http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=940DE4DA1E3AF93BA25753C1A96E948260. Retrieved 2008-02-01. 

^ John Robinson (1988-10-19). “Nancy Reagan’s Dress Blues: Borrowing Clothes From Top Designers May Be Chic, But Is It Proper?” (fee required). The Boston Globe. http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P2-8084313.html. Retrieved 2008-02-07. 

^ a b Hochswender, Woody (January 10, 1989). “Fashion; Amid the Rustle of Finery, Fashion Celebrates Its Own”. The New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/1989/01/10/style/fashion-amid-the-rustle-of-finery-fashion-celebrates-its-own.html. Retrieved 2009-07-22. 

^ a b c d e Santini, Maureen (September 12, 1981). “Nancy Reagan’s White House china: 9,508″. Associated Press, published in The St. Petersburg Times (Google News Archives). http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=p_INAAAAIBAJ&sjid=FnsDAAAAIBAJ&pg=6521,2662729. Retrieved 2009-07-23. 

^ “”Lenox: White House”". Lenox, Inc. http://www.lenox.com/index.cfm?ss=services&cat=about&lp=whitehouse. Retrieved 2007-06-02. 

^ Klapthor, Margaret Brown (1999), p. 184

^ Downie, Leonard Jr. (1981-07-30). “Britain Celebrates, Charles Takes a Bride”. The Washington Post. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/inatl/longterm/diana/background/wedding1.htm. Retrieved 2007-11-16. 

^ Page, Susan (2004-06-13). “Husband’s Past will shape Nancy Reagan”. USA Today. http://www.usatoday.com/life/people/2004-06-13-nancy-reagan_x.htm. Retrieved 2007-03-08. 

^ Neuman, Johanna and David Willman (August 19, 2007). “Michael K. Deaver: 1938 – 2007 – Image guru set the stage for Reagan”. The Los Angeles Times: p. 5. http://articles.latimes.com/2007/aug/19/local/me-deaver19?pg=4. Retrieved 2009-07-29. 

^ Reagan, Nancy (1989), p. 56

^ Moore, Boothe (January 18, 2009). “Can she stay ‘everywoman’?”. The Los Angeles Times. http://articles.latimes.com/2009/01/18/features/ig-michelle18. Retrieved 2009-02-05. 

^ a b Usborne, David (June 2, 2009). “Nancy Reagan: I still see Ronnie in my bedroom”. The Independent. http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/nancy-reagan-i-still-see-ronnie-in-my-bedroom-1694535.html. Retrieved 2009-06-03. 

^ Schifando and Joseph (2007), p. 165

^ Schifando and Joseph (2007), pp. 169-172

^ Schifando and Joseph (2007), p. 175

^ Schifando and Joseph (2007), p. 173

^ a b c d “”Mrs. Reagan’s Crusade”". Ronald Reagan Foundation. http://www.reaganfoundation.org/reagan/nancy/just_say_no.asp. Retrieved 2007-03-08. 

^ “Remarks at the Nancy Reagan Drug Abuse Center Benefit Dinner in Los Angeles, California”. Ronald Reagan Foundation. 1989-01-04. http://www.reagan.utexas.edu/archives/speeches/1989/010489a.htm. Retrieved 2007-10-03. “…in Oakland where a schoolchild in an audience Nancy was addressing stood up and asked what she and her friends should say when someone offered them drugs. And Nancy said, “Just say no.” And within a few months thousands of Just Say No clubs had sprung up in schools around the country.” 

^ Loizeau, Pierre-Marie. Nancy Reagan: The Woman Behind the Man (1984). Nova Publishers, pp. 104-105

^ “‘Diff’rent Strokes’: The Reporter (1983)”. The Internet Movie Database. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0560083/. Retrieved 2007-10-18. 

^ Brian L. Dyak (Executive Producer), William N. Utz (Executive Producer). (1985-12-11). Stop the Madness. [Music Video]. Hollywood, California and The White House, Washington, D.C.: E.I.C.. Event occurs at 3:15. 

^ Tribute to Nancy Reagan. [Motion picture]. Motion Picture Association, Ronald Reagan Presidential Library. May 2005. Event occurs at 3:08. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KZM0ioS1g58. Retrieved 2008-11-07. 

^ “Thirty Years of America’s Drug War”. pbs.org. http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/drugs/cron/. Retrieved 2007-04-04. 

^ a b Elliott, Jeff (May 1993). “Just say nonsense – Nancy Reagan’s drug education programs”. Washington Monthly. pp. 3. http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1316/is_n5_v25/ai_13786316/pg_3. Retrieved 2007-10-10. 

^ Hancock, David (June 5, 2004). “His Fierce Protector: Nancy”. CBS. http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/06/05/national/main621274.shtml. Retrieved 2007-11-15. 

^ Reagan, Nancy (1989), p. 5

^ Noonan, Peggy. “Character Above All: Ronald Reagan essay”. PBS. http://www.pbs.org/newshour/character/essays/reagan.html. Retrieved 2007-08-15. 

^ “Final Edited Transcript: Interview with Max Friedersdorf” (PDF). Miller Center of Public Affairs. October 2425, 2002. pp. 60. http://webstorage3.mcpa.virginia.edu/poh/materials/oph_2002_1024_friedersdorf.pdf. Retrieved 2007-10-20. “Mrs. Reagan was all upset, of course. He said that Senator [Strom] Thurmond had come over to the hospital and had talked his way in, past the lobby, up to the President roome in intensive care, tubes coming out of his nose and his throat, tubes in his arms and everythingnd said that Strom Thurmond had talked his way past the secret service into his room and Mrs. Reagan was outraged, distraught. She couldn believe her eyes. He said, ‘You know, those guys are crazy. They come over here trying to get a picture in front of the hospital and trying to talk to the President when he may be on his deathbed.” 

^ Burns, Lisa (2008), pp. 130, 138139

^ Reagan, Nancy (1989), p. 21

^ Ivins, Molly (March 18, 1990). “Stars and Strife”. The New York Times. http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9C0CEEDF1030F93BA25750C0A966958260&sec;=&spon;=&pagewanted=print. Retrieved 2007-11-16. 

^ Anthony, C.S. (1991), p. 396

^ Anthony, C.S. (1991), p. 398

^ Thomas, Rhys (Writer/Producer); Donaldson, Sam (interviewee). (2005). The Presidents. [Documentary]. A&E Television. http://shop.history.com/detail.php?a=71740. 

^ Kurtz, Howard (2007-05-02). “Ronald Reagan, In His Own Words”. The Washington Post. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/05/01/AR2007050102070.html. Retrieved 2007-10-20. 

^ Reagan, Nancy (1989), p. 44, p. 47

^ a b c d “Nancy Reagan emerges as public icon”. BBC News. 2004-06-10. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/3794125.stm. Retrieved 2007-11-02. 

^ Reagan, Nancy (1989), p. 62

^ Celestine Bohlen (December 8, 1988). “The Gorbachev Visit; Another Obstacle Falls: Nancy Reagan and Raisa Gorbachev Get Chummy”. The New York Times. http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=940DE6DD1039F93BA35751C1A96E948260. Retrieved 2008-10-14. 

^ Chua-Eoan, Howard G. (June 6, 1988). “”My Wife Is a Very Independent Lady”". Time. http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,967592-1,00.html. Retrieved 2007-10-05. 

^ a b c Burns, Lisa (2008), pp. 139140

^ a b “Nancy Reagan Criticizes Aides to President”. The New York Times. Reuters. 1988-11-13. http://www.nytimes.com/1988/11/13/us/nancy-reagan-criticizes-aides-to-president.html. Retrieved 2009-05-16. 

^ Reagan, Nancy (1989), p. vii

^ Reagan, Nancy (1989), p. 65

^ Altman, Lawrence K (October 18, 1987). “Surgeons Remove Cancerous Breast of Nancy Reagan”. The New York Times. http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?sec=health&res=9B0DE2DA123DF93BA25753C1A961948260. Retrieved 2008-06-23. 

^ Reagan, Nancy (1989), p. 285

^ “Perspectives in Disease Prevention and Health Promotion Trends in Screening Mammograms for Women 50 Years of Age and Older Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 1987″. Department of Health and Human Services. March 10, 1989. http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/00001360.htm. Retrieved 2008-06-23. 

^ a b “A Look Back At The Polls”. CBS Interactive Inc. June 7, 2004. http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/06/07/opinion/polls/main621632.shtml. Retrieved 2007-10-14. 

^ Stevens, Pam (January 21, 2001). “Reagan paid back his friends for house they bought for him”. CNN. http://archives.cnn.com/2001/ALLPOLITICS/stories/01/26/reagan.house/index.html. Retrieved 2007-11-16. 

^ Netburn, Deborah (December 24, 2006). “Agenting for God”. Los Angeles Times. http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/latimes/access/1185261551.html?dids=1185261551:1185261551&FMT=ABS. Retrieved 2007-11-16. 

^ a b “Ronald Reagan dies at 93″. CNN. 2004-06-05. http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/06/05/reagan.health/. Retrieved 2007-02-07. 

^ “Nancy Reagan: Her Life and Times”. Ronald Reagan Presidential Foundation. http://www.reaganfoundation.org/reagan/nancy/nancy_bio.asp. Retrieved 2007-05-12. 

^ “My Turn Review”. A-1 Wom…

Incoming search terms:

Printing Press

History

Finely crafted booksike the 1259 Song Dynasty Bencao (materia medica) shown hereere produced by woodblock in China as early as the ninth century, the earliest known being the Diamond Sutra.

The overall invention of Gutenberg’s printing method depended for some of its elements upon a diffusion of technologies from China (East Asia), primarily the Chinese inventions and innovations of paper, in addition to a growing demand by the general European public for the lower cost paper books, instead of the exorbitantly expensive parchment books. By 1424, Cambridge University library owned only 122 booksach of which had a value equal to a farm or vineyard. The demand for these books was driven by rising literacy amongst the middle class and students in Western Europe. At this time, the Renaissance was still in its early stages and the populace was gradually removing the monopoly the clergy had held on literacy.

While woodblock printing had arrived in Europe at approximately the same time paper did, this method was not as suitable for literary communication as it was in the east. Block printing is well-suited to the ancient written Chinese because character alignment is not critical, but the existence of over 100,000 ancient characters and hieroglyphic symbols made the ancient Chinese movable type technology somewhat inefficient and economically impractical affecting the profits of the ancient Chinese book publishers. With the Latin alphabet, however, the need for precise alignment and a much simpler character set positioned movable type as a great advance for the west.

The use of a press was a key technological difference provided European book publishers increased profits over their ancient Chinese counterpartshe screw-based presses used in wine and olive oil production. Attaining mechanical sophistication in approximately 1000, devices for applying pressure on a flat-plane were common in Europe.

Gutenberg’s press

In this woodblock from 1568, the printer at left is removing a page from the press while the one at right inks the text-blocks

Johannes Gutenberg’s work on the printing press began in approximately 1436 when he partnered with Andreas Dritzehn man he had previously instructed in gem-cuttingnd Andreas Heilmann, owner of a paper mill. However, it was not until a 1439 lawsuit against Gutenberg that an official record exists; witnesses’ testimony discussed Gutenberg’s types, an inventory of metals (including lead), and his type molds.

Others in Europe were also developing movable type at this time, including goldsmith Procopius Waldfoghel of France and Laurens Janszoon Coster of the Netherlands. However, they are not known to have contributed specific advances to the printing press.

Having previously worked as a professional goldsmith, Gutenberg made skillful use of the knowledge of metals he had learned as a craftsman. He was the first to make type from an alloy of lead, tin, and antimony, which was critical for producing durable type that produced high-quality printed books and proved to be more suitable for printing than the clay, wooden or bronze types invented in East Asia. To create these lead types, Gutenberg used what is considered one of his most ingenious inventions, a special matrix enabling the quick and precise moulding of new type blocks from a uniform template.

Gutenberg is also credited with the introduction of an oil-based ink which was more durable than the previously used water-based inks. As printing material he used both vellum and paper, the latter having been introduced in Europe a few centuries earlier from China by way of the Arabs.

In the Gutenberg Bible, Gutenberg made a trial of coloured printing for a few of the page headings, present only in some copies. A later work, the Mainz Psalter of 1453, presumably designed by Gutenberg but published under the imprint of his successors Johann Fust and Peter Schffer, had elaborate red and blue printed initials.

Historical impact

See also: History of typography in East Asia

Printing as developed in East Asia did not make use of a printing press as in Gutenberg’s case. Although the invention of movable type in China and Korea preceded Gutenberg’s printing press, the impact of East Asian movable type printing presses was not as influential as it was in Western European society. This was likely due to the enormous amount of labour involved in manipulating the thousands of porcelain tablets, or in the case of Korea, metal tablets, required by the use of written Chinese characters. Nevertheless, hundreds of thousands of books, on subjects ranging from Confucian Classics to science and mathematics, were printed using the older technology of woodblock printing, creating the world’s first print culture.

In contrast, the impact of Gutenberg’s printing press in Europe was comparable to the development of writing, the invention of the alphabet or the Internet, as far as its effects on society.[citation needed] Just as writing did not replace speaking, printing did not achieve a position of total dominance. Handwritten manuscripts continued to be produced, and the different graphic modes of communication continued to influence each other.

The printing press was also a factor in the establishment of a community of scientists who could easily communicate their discoveries through the establishment of widely disseminated scholarly journals, helping to bring on the scientific revolution.[citation needed] Because of the printing press, authorship became more meaningful and profitable. It was suddenly important who had said or written what, and what the precise formulation and time of composition was. This allowed the exact citing of references, producing the rule, “One Author, one work (title), one piece of information” (Giesecke, 1989; 325). Before, the author was less important, since a copy of Aristotle made in Paris would not be exactly identical to one made in Bologna. For many works prior to the printing press, the name of the author was entirely lost.[citation needed]

Because the printing process ensured that the same information fell on the same pages, page numbering, tables of contents, and indices became common, though they previously had not been unknown.[citation needed] The process of reading was also changed, gradually changing over several centuries from oral readings to silent, private reading.[citation needed] The wider availability of printed materials also led to a drastic rise in the adult literacy rate throughout Europe.[citation needed]

The printing press was an important step towards the democratization of knowledge. Within fifty or sixty years of the invention of the printing press, the entire classical canon had been reprinted and widely promulgated throughout Europe (Eisenstein, 1969; 52). Now that more people had access to knowledge both new and old, more people could discuss these works. Furthermore, now that book production was a more commercial enterprise, the first copyright laws were passed to protect what we now would call intellectual property rights. A second outgrowth of this popularization of knowledge was the decline of Latin as the language of most published works, to be replaced by the vernacular language of each area, increasing the variety of published works. Paradoxically, the printed word also helped to unify and standardize the spelling and syntax of these vernaculars, in effect ‘decreasing’ their variability. This rise in importance of national languages as opposed to pan-European Latin is cited as one of the causes of the rise of nationalism in Europe.

The art of book printing

For years, book printing was considered a true art form. Typesetting, or the placement of the characters on the page, including the use of ligatures, was passed down from master to apprentice. In Germany, the art of typesetting was termed the “black art,” in allusion to the ink-covered printers. The Black Art Press & Print in Baltimore, MD adopted their name for this reason. It has largely been replaced by computer typesetting programs, which make it easy to get similar results more quickly and with less physical labor. Some practitioners continue to print books the way Gutenberg did. For example, there is a yearly convention of traditional book printers in Mainz, Germany.

Some theorists, such as McLuhan, Eisenstein, Kittler, and Giesecke, see an “alphabetic monopoly” as having developed from printing, removing the role of the image from society. Other authors stress that printed works themselves are a visual medium. Certainly, modern developments in printing have revitalized the role of illustrations.

The Industrial Revolution

Main article: Industrial Revolution

Koenig’s 1814 steam-powered printing press

The Gutenberg press was much more efficient than manual copying and still was largely unchanged in the eras of John Baskerville and Giambattista Bodoniver 300 years later. By 1800, Lord Stanhope had constructed a press completely from cast iron, reducing the force required by 90% while doubling the size of the printed area. While Stanhope’s “mechanical theory” had improved the efficiency of the press, it still was only capable of 250 sheets per hour. German printer Friedrich Koenig would be the first to design a non-manpowered machinesing steam. Having moved to London in 1804, Koenig soon met Thomas Bensley and secured financial support for his project in 1807. Patented in 1810, Koenig had designed a steam press “much like a hand press connected to a steam engine.” The first production trial of this model occurred in April 1811. He produced his machine with assistance from German engineer Andreas Friedrich Bauer.

Koenig and Bauer sold two of their first models to The Times in London in 1814, capable of 1,100 impressions per hour. The first edition so printed was on November 28, 1814. They went on to perfect the early model so that it could print on both sides of a sheet at once. This began the long process of making newspapers available to a mass audience (which in turn helped spread literacy), and from the 1820s changed the nature of book production, forcing a greater standardization in titles and other metadata. Their company Koenig & Bauer AG is still one of the world’s largest manufacturers of printing presses today.

The Miehle P.P. & Mfg. Co. 1905

The steam powered rotary printing press, invented in 1843 in the United States by Richard M. Hoe, allowed millions of copies of a page in a single day. Mass production of printed works flourished after the transition to rolled paper, as continuous feed allowed the presses to run at a much faster pace.

Also, in the middle of the 19th century, there was a separate development of jobbing presses, small presses capable of printing small-format pieces such as billheads, letterheads, business cards, and envelopes. Jobbing presses were capable of quick set-up (average setup time for a small job was under 15 minutes) and quick production (even on treadle-powered jobbing presses it was considered normal to get 1,000 impressions per hour [iph] with one pressman, with speeds of 1,500 iph often attained on simple envelope work).[citation needed] Job printing emerged as a reasonably cost-effective duplicating solution for commerce at this time.

A late 1930′s Platen printing press model

By the late 1930s or early 1940s, printing presses had increased substantially in efficiency: a model by Platen Printing Press was capable of performing 2,500 to 3,000 impressions per hour.[citation needed]

Later inventions in this field include the following:

Lithography

Offset printing

Desktop publishing

Electronic publishing

Computer printer

Composing stick

See also

Augustus Applegath – inventor of the vertical print press

Anilox

Color printing

David Bruce

Flexography

George E. Clymer

Letterpress printing

Muller Martini

Medical Renaissance

National Print Museum of Ireland

Print culture

Printing

Printmaking

Typography

William Clowes (Printer)

Adana Printing Presses

Notes

^ Hind, 6

^ Meggs, Philip B. A History of Graphic Design. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 1998. (p 24) ISBN 0-471-291-98-6

^ a b c d e f g h i j k l Meggs, Philip B. A History of Graphic Design. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 1998. (pp 5869) ISBN 0-471-291-98-6

^ David Bird, Understanding Wine Technology The Science of Wine Explained, p 47 ISBN 1-891267-91-4

^ While the Encyclopdia Britannica Eleventh Edition had attributed the invention of the printing press to Coster, the more recent editions of the work attribute it to Gutenberg to reflect, as it says, the common consent that has developed in the 20th century.Typography – Gutenberg and printing in Germany. Encyclopdia Britannica 2007. On the other hand, the Klnische Chronik (The Cologne Chronicle), published in 1499, states that a prototype for Gutenberg’s printing press was invented in the Netherlands and that Donatus’s Ars minor was printed there much earlier than in Mainz.. Costeriana

^ Albert Kapr, “Johannes Gutenberg”, Scolar 1996, p. 172

^ Albert Kapr, “Johannes Gutenberg”, Scolar 1996, p. 203

^ A Hyatt Mayor, Prints and People, Metropolitan Museum of Art/Princeton, 1971, nos 1-4. ISBN 0691003262

^ Malte Herwig, “Google’s Total Library”, Spiegel Online International, Mar. 28, 2007.

^ Howard Rheingold, “Moblogs Seen as a Crystal Ball for a New Era in Online Journalism”, Online Journalism Review, Jul. 9, 2009.

^ a b c d e f Meggs, Philip B. A History of Graphic Design. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 1998. (pp 130133) ISBN 0-471-291-98-6

^ Meggs, Philip B. (1998). A History of Graphic Design (Third ed.). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.. pp. 147. ISBN 978-0471291985. 

References

Fontaine, Jean-Paul. L’aventure du livre: Du manuscrit medieval a nos jours. Paris: Bibliothque de l’image, 1999.

Hind, Arthur M.; An Introduction to a History of Woodcut, Houghton Mifflin Co. 1935 (in USA), reprinted Dover Publications, 1963 ISBN 0-486-20952-0

Citation from The Encyclopedia of World History Sixth Edition, Peter N. Stearns (general editor), 2001 The Houghton Mifflin Company, at Bartleby.com.

Further reading

On the effects of Gutenberg’s printing

Elizabeth L. Eisenstein, The Printing Press as an Agent of Change, Cambridge University Press, September 1980, Paperback, 832 pages, ISBN 0-521-29955-1

More recent, abridged version: Elizabeth L. Eisenstein, The Printing Revolution in Early Modern Europe, Cambridge University Press, 2Rev ed, 12 September 2005, Paperback, ISBN 0-521-60774-4

Marshall McLuhan, The Gutenberg Galaxy: The Making of Typographic Man (1962) Univ. of Toronto Press (1st ed.); reissued by Routledge & Kegan Paul ISBN 0-7100-1818-5.

External links

Wikimedia Commons has media related to: Printing press

Centre for the History of the Book

Gutenberg printing Photos of Incunabula and the Gutenberg Bible (1455)

BGDP Safety on printing presses

Internet Archive: Printing (1947) film from the Prelinger Archives explaining the printing industry

An Introduction to Letterpress Printing

Careers for the 21st Century: Printing Press Operators

Categories: Printing | 1445 introductionsHidden categories: All articles with unsourced statements | Articles with unsourced statements from November 2009

Incoming search terms:

Deceit And Denial Upon Our Ramparts

 

Deceit and Denial upon Our Ramparts.

An Open letter to the Republican Party and America.

 

Americans are literally dumbstruck by the level of deceit and the magnitude of denial emanating from our White House and Congress.  How many laws can one man break!  How far must America fall before Republicans escape their denial and find their honor?

 

For those of you who still labor under the hallucinogenic cloud of denial that Obama is “a nice” man, we say this:  “Get Over It”!  He is a deliberate liar, a Marxist by birth, by creed and by indoctrination, a corrupted emotional mal-content and indisputably the most dangerous man in recent American history.

 

Pundits and talking heads keep saying that Obama and his administration just don’t get it, can’t learn from their mistakes,  aren’t listening or don’t understand the average American citizen.  Nothing could be further from the truth.  Obama is listening, he does understand us and he gets it.  He just hates what we stand for.  It’s the Republicans that aren’t listening, don’t get it and don’t understand that we get it, we understand and we will do something about it.  We are tired of being collateral damage to a deceitful, disdaining administration run by ideologues with no practical experience at any level and by politicians who lie, cheat and steal from every living human on this planet by virtue of their supposed elitist entitlement as members of a “ruling class”.

 

Obama is not incompetent either.  He knows precisely what he is doing.  His ancient agenda is deliberate and premeditated, full of disdain for everything America stands for, full of contempt for “rich people”, “poor people”, free enterprise, white people, black people, brown people, white women in particular, Jews, Christians, Catholics, Mormons, freedom, American tradition and American law.  Want proof, just read his books. He is clever, deceitful and damaged goods with no shame and no conscience.  To a nation of ordained free patriots, Obama’s appearance of total incompetency is simply the measure of his intent and his refusal to accept the reality that socialism is not an acceptable form of government to Americans and a historically failed, incompetent system.  Each day, while Europe scrambles to free and save itself from another miserably failed socialist experiment, Obama drives another nail into the coffin of our Republic.

 

Some argue his agenda for redistributing our wealth is his answer to the slavery reparations act that he voted against because he believed the act “did not go far enough”.  It is not.  It is his assuredly clever mechanism for garnering voter support by inciting racism and tension while wrecking the engine of American prosperity, the middle class.  The Reparations Act was to be a onetime payment and the end of the grievance; ObamaCare, Cap and Trade, Immigration Reform, Financial Reform, the Disclose Act, the endless corporate bailouts and socialist takeovers, the Gulf oil spill fiasco, are all permanent tragedies with permanent, endless damage to America.  Obama is not interested in bona fide social reform; he is intent on his “Fundamental Transformation of America” with the institution of Marxist style slavery for every American regardless of color, class, citizenship or religion!  His agenda is simply class warfare without regard for anyone but the few that will reign over the spoils of our Nation.  A man is known by his actions.  Obama’s actions are not the mark of a “nice man” or a “great guy”.  They are the mark of “enemy of state”, calamitous intent and broken dreams for America.

 

While Republicans in Congress sit paralyzed and ineffectual, perhaps still voting for Obama’s Marxist agenda or while they gather together in secret trying to figure out how they can maintain their own power in the ruinous vacuum of the wreckage they helped create, America is dying.  They cannot survive the hollowing remnants of our Nation when Obama is done with his malevolent intent.  What they cleave to so dearly now will be vapor when our Republic is gone.  The deteriorating situation we find ourselves in is no accident and their imagined collegiality with the Democrats doesn’t exist.  Democrats are no longer the “left side of right”.  They are the enemy of our Nation as clearly as Napoleon, Hitler, Marx, Lenin, Stalin, Mussolini, Franco, Nero, Muhammad, Mao, Putin, Ahmadinejad, Wen Jiabao, Kim Jong-Il, HAMAS, Drug Cartels or Hezbollah.  To the Republicans we say: “Be the Party of NO”.  “In fact be the Party of Hell NO!”  “We have your back.”  We don’t need politicians’ permission to pursue greatness for our Nation or ourselves.  Pandering to illegals, terrorists, big business, lobbyists, unions or Marxist countries is anti-American and Treason.  We don’t need new laws and Czars to control or protect our enemies or America.  We already have the necessary laws.  Just read the Constitution.  It already protects everyone!  Believers in Obama’s agenda will be destroyed in the same stroke of anti-American demagoguery that is consuming the very life of our Nation’s citizens.

 

Our Nation is being governed by Marxists, liars, pedophiles, tax cheats, union thugs, racists, race baiters, feckless ideologues, lobbyists, corporate thieves, the infamously corrupt Federal Reserve, members of the Council On Foreign Relations, the Bilderbergs’, the Rothschild’s family of 300, Skull and Bones, Black Liberation theologists, avowed communists, genocidal prophets, abortionists, corporate brigands, terrorist sympathizers, freeloaders, illegal aliens, foreign governments, the United Nations, NATO, the European Union, ACORN, George Soros and his 500 hundred subversive organizations and the most corrupt, dishonest, incompetent and galactically stupid anti-American liberal media in America’s history .  Why would any honest, hard working contributor to America’s history, its earned place in the world, its defense, its greatness or its success trust anyone that belongs to any segment of this anti-American freedom hating group of people?  There are 535 politicians vying for power.  When the 300 take over the United States, you will become obsolete by your own doing.  We can save you; will you stand up and save us?  Will you trade power and status quo for ethics and service to our Nation?  Can you name just one law or executive order signed by Obama that does not violate our Constitution, violate States rights, steal our property, vacate our personal rights, redistribute our wealth, pander for votes, power or money from freeloaders, anti-American groups and nations or bypass our representative government and its elected members?  We think not!

 

Those of you who voted for any of Obama’s legislation will soon find yourselves peddling ghost written books in a pathetic attempt to reshape your image and deeds and in an equally pathetic attempt to reclaim the honor and dignity you forfeited when you deceived the people who entrusted you with protecting our rights, our liberties and our Nation’s Constitution, once the envy of the free world.  You sold us out, you killed our sovereignty, you took our civil and constitutional rights, our property, you outright stole our social security, laundered our money and now you deny our States the rights clearly given them by our Constitution.  You committed acts of fraud and larceny against the very people who elected you.  You pass patently unconstitutional laws in the dark fraught with taxes and fines and handouts at our expense without any regard for us or the law.  Many of you should be in jail, as we would be, for the very acts you have committed against our Nation while in office.

 

We ask again . . . how many laws can one man break: before he is tried and convicted of Treason! How many acts of defiance of our Constitutional law before he is tried and convicted of Treason?

 

The very fact that he allowed a Mexican President to stand before our Congress to denigrate and insult ALL Americans is Treason!
To allow and encourage this foreigner and 9 other Latin American countries to sue a sovereign American State over its Constitutional right to protect its own borders against criminal acts and trespass is Treason.
To sue a sovereign State over its Constitutional right to protect its own borders against criminal acts and trespass is Treason.
To sue one state for political expediency, and not the others, is constitutionally illegal.
To refuse to secure any of our borders against criminal acts and trespass is Treason.  The Constitution of the United States is crystal clear on this.

 

This man that refuses to show his own papers refuses to make illegals show theirs. Incompetent, no, just another clever set of racist diversions from the one you think is a nice guy, the one that can’t even prove he is qualified to lead our Nation.  How pathetic!  How revealing!  But the real question is: what are Republicans willing to give up in order of righting the ship?  Are they willing to risk losing control of their “secret society” or their precious “power circles” and stand with the American citizens, one to one as freedom fighting individuals, who are waging the fight to win back the America we love?  The America we have fought for countless times to protect with our own blood!  The America we have lost!  The America that has been torn, apart piece by piece, by those who fully intend to destroy our Republic for all time.  Do they have the courage to risk going back home, joining the citizens of their States and represent the will of their own people, the ones who pay their salaries, the ones who gave their trust for the sake of all, the ones they have ignored, insulted, pillaged and laughed at?  You know who we mean; the “dumb black and Hispanic people”, the “ignorant white trailer trash”, the “old people” that don’t matter because they will be dead soon, the “young people” who aren’t paying attention, the “young woman’ with child who scraps for survival, the Christian or Jewish person who actually believes in a God, the 50 year “old man” working two jobs to save his home and feed his family, the 80 year old woman facing the death panel of the ObamaCare Czar because she needs a new hip!  Is that who you think we are – sheep for the slaughter – or do we command the same respect from you that you claim for yourselves as elitist members of the Congressional rank and file?

 

Americans are mournfully tired of the politics in Washington.  We are rightfully fearful for our future, rightfully angry at politicians who place their careers and ambitions before the law, before the people, before the States or before our allies.  We want change anchored in the expressed intent of the collective intelligent design of our Founding Fathers for our government.  The Constitution is our law.  It is not just a “piece of paper” to be ignored, trampled or used as contrivance or convenience by a ruling class.  Americans do not support, recognize nor will we tolerate a ruling class.  We support free enterprise, the right for every citizen to be educated, to work and to pursue their personal dreams unhindered by any form of government that seeks to limit our pursuits or steal our possessions by theft or taxation.  We absolutely reject any form of wealth redistribution by any form of government.  We support charity of our own choosing and disaster relief.  We support self-reliance, pride and honesty; we support character, free will and personal responsibility.  We are a conservative nation.  The people elected you to serve our Nation, not the corporations, unions or foreign potentates that donate millions of dollars for your campaigns.  The question you must ask yourself is why should we support you anymore if your allegiance belongs to big money groups rather than the people and the States you were elected to represent?  Lead our Nation as our Founding Fathers intended.  Clean up your “own house” and the others will follow.  Service to our Nation is where you will create real power, for our people, and where you will find your real legacy.  Then you can write your books with pride and we will honor you as we honor our soldiers who give their lives for our Nation, the ones who die for your folly.

 

We have risen and we are ready for the fight against all comers no matter how long it takes.  We can’t know the full extent of the danger our own government represents to us, but we will not succumb to it.  We can’t know the full extent of the danger that each member of Congress represents to us, but we know who is good and who is evil.  The trail each of you has left is easy to follow.  We don’t need to know how evil someone is, we just need to know who is evil.  We ask all conservatives and all American patriots to join us or just stand aside.  We are weary of you!  You are not highwaymen and we will not “Stand and Deliver” our nation unto you.

 

Anyone who is a member or supporter of the Council On Foreign Relations or any other wretched “One World Order” group is the enemy of all Americans and the entire free world.  Anyone who voted for any of Obama’s legislation; anyone who is for Amnesty, Cap and Trade, ObamaCare, Financial Reform, Elena Kagan, loss of guns rights or freedom of speech rights will be voted out of office.  Anyone who supports Obama, his Czars, the likes of Pelosi, Reid, Dodd, Frank, Durbin, Shumer, Snowe, Brown, Collins, Graham, Landrieu, Nelson, Lincoln, Waters or Boxer will be voted out of office.  Anyone who supports “Big Business”, the ACLU, AARP, the NRA, SEIU, ACORN, Sharia Law, MoveOn.org or the 16th Amendment, which was never properly ratified, will be voted out of office.  Anyone who supports the continued destruction of our laws, our traditions, our education system, our industry, any part of our way of life that has been guaranteed by The Constitution of The United States of America will be voted out of office.

 

It appears to us that Republicans don’t have an agenda to present to constituents or they are hiding it for fear it would not be politically expedient.  Too many Republicans back away from Paul Ryan’s plan, Jim De Mint’s conservatism, the Rand Paul candidacy, Sarah Palin, Jan Brewer, Michelle Bachmann and her newly minted Congressional Tea Party Caucus and the people’s Tea Party movement.  So what is your plan?  The loudest voices we hear are mostly of brave Republican women while our men cower in back rooms and local D.C. bars at loss with their cojones.  Being in the congressional minority should not prevent Republicans from mounting a full frontal attack from every angle against the arrogance and death spiraling policies of the progressive Democratic Party, RINOS and DINOS.  We plead this of you:  Go Public, Go National!  Go United!  Pick a team of intelligent, gifted speakers to represent “your plan” and then let these best and brightest present the components locally to all voters across the land.  If we don’t know “what” you stand for, we don’t know “who” you stand with.

These are the things Republicans need to do immediately to save our Nation.

-Unite with Us! – Join the Congressional Tea Party Caucus.
-Find someone in haste that truly cares about and puts America first to run the Republican National Committee.  We need someone who can galvanize all Americans with the truth and the guarantee of freedom for all who will stand with us and our Nation.
-Stand with Paul Ryan and support his “Roadmap for America’s Future”.  It may not be perfect but at least he has had the courage and intelligence to formulate one.  Americans know that strong medicine is necessary at this moment in our history.
-Stand with and fully support the Tea Party movement and sign the “Contract from America”.
-Select genuine Fiscal conservatives of great character to run for President and vice-President.  We don’t want the “next guy in line”, another Fascist as a change of pace to the Marxists we have now.  180 degrees from wrong is still not right.
-Agree to repeal every piece of legislation passed under the Obama Administration, ad infinitum.
-Mount your bayonets; this is a full scale war to Take Back Our Country from the all out assault and intent of turning America into a third world nation of hapless slaves to be governed by the global Marxists ideologues that have spent 100+ years in the planning and subterfuge for global power and dictatorship which can only be accomplished by the destruction of The Republic of the United States of America and thus placing it on ash heap of history.  The Republic belongs to us, all 300 million of us.  It does not belong to the Democratic or Republican parties, those 535 people elected temporally to represent us and serve our Nation.  It does not belong to any external group, family, people or organization and we have no Natural allegiance to any of them.

Help US Take Back America! Otherwise, please stand aside.  We are weary of you!

 

Some say it will take years to undo the damage done by the last few administrations.  You can do it in a year.  Start by repealing every piece of legislation and voiding every executive order signed by Barrack Obama.  You have two years to prepare for a complete legislative rectification of the duplicate, useless, unconstitutional Marxist seepage that is strangling our Congress, our States, our Nation, our courts, our institutions and our freedom.  Start over for those issues that really need to be addressed like tax reform, health care, immigration.

 

To All Republicans:  It is time to get real; time for a genuine epiphany.  America is in dire peril at our own doing.  We ask you to move right.  Re-take your Oath of Allegiance to The United States of America followed by your Oath of Office to support and protect The Constitution of The United States.  Get down on your hands and knees, kiss our Flag and pray for forgiveness for you crimes against America.  Those who stand against our Nation will stand alone in the courts of American justice.  Those who stand against our Nation will be cast aside in the voting booths of America and will stand alone and forgotten.

The majority of people in the United States, your voters, support these issues.

Uphold and Protect The Constitution and The Bill of Rights.
We want a smaller Federal government. Cut by at least 30%.
A Balanced Budget. Citizens have to live within their means, so should governments.  Our Federal government is too large.  Its reach is too deep, usurping the rights of citizens, the States and the Federal budget is unsustainable.
End the Corrupt Federal Reserve Bank. Return to the gold standard and/or a National Central bank.
Support States Rights as defined by the Constitution. The Constitution only grants the Federal government 17 enumerated rights.  The rest are granted to the States.  Heed this law!
A Strong Military.  There is no substitute!
Secure the Borders.  No Amnesty! These people are illegal and have committed multiple crimes against America.  There are 12 million of them.  If they don’t like their own country, then they should go home, armed to the teeth and take it back, not invade our country out of convenience and timidity.  They have no rights as illegals.  That’s the law!
English as the Official Language of the United States.  One Flag “Old Glory”.  “One Nation, Under God!”
Resign from the UN. This organization is run by Marxists and is incapable of serving America’s interests or individual freedom.
Energy Independence.  Find it, drill it!
Focus on job creation and business growth, tax reform, tax amnesty for corporations with offshore accounts, tort reform, getting unions out of our government and institutions.  Kill AFTA!
Congressional Term Limits with a national recall mechanism that only takes a few weeks for any Federal servant that refuses to keep their oath of office or obey the laws of our Nation or our States.
Repeal the 16th Amendment.  Replace the income tax system with the Fair Tax. Boost the economy by igniting business and repatriating oversees jobs.  Everyone pays their fair share including illegals and criminals.
Repeal the 17th Amendment. Let State Governors choose Senators to represent the States.  This will ensure accountability to the people they serve; eliminate lobbyists, bribes, voter corruption and intimidation.
Close the Dept. of Education. Education is a state responsibility not a Marxist play ground for corrupting our history and our children’s minds and souls.
End Pork barrel spending. This is only paybacks, theft, bribery and corruption.
End all bailouts of public institutions.  End all financial and political support of: unions, media organizations, all voter groups like ACORN, student loan forgiveness for Congressional member’s children, unemployment support for foreign countries and bribes to foreign countries to get their support.
Make lobbying a federal congressional member a felony.
Fix Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid. Return all our money stolen by Congress.
Pass a new law that requires every elected federal employee to provide the same proof of eligibility to each state Governor. To include a general medical statement of health, a certified birth certificate, income and tax returns, police arrest records, judicial rulings and military service records including awards and judgments.
Repeal every single executive order and piece of legislation signed by Obama.
Repeal or overturn all Federal laws or rulings outlawing prayer, religious activity or religious writings in all government, private or public domains, documents, currency, spaces, or institutions. The Constitution grants no authority to the Federal government over these issues.  This is a States rights issue and should be voted on by the citizens of each state.
Repeal or overturn all Federal laws or rulings regarding abortion or marriage. The Constitution grants no authority to the Federal government over these issues.  This is a States rights issue and should be voted on by the citizens of each state.
Repeal or overturn all Federal laws or rulings regarding education and health care. The Constitution grants no authority to the Federal government over these issues.  This is a States rights issue and should be voted on by the citizens of each state.
Reform all laws regarding campaign donations.  Place equal limits on individuals and corporations. If you are doing a good job, you don’t need to waste millions of public or private dollars getting re-elected.  Let the States participate by mandating town hall participation several times per year where appointed state representatives can meet with elected Congressional members to discuss legislation, national or state concerns.  You were chosen to be the voice of the people that elected you, not judge and jury over our lives by some perverted sense of divine right.  What we expect, demand and deserve from you is no less than we expect from our fireman, our soldiers, our teachers, our doctors or our clergy.

 

The first eleven items ensure a Republican victory in 2010 and 2012, to the extent that the progressive Democratic Party will be ineffective for at least 20 years.  A Conservative victory is the only choice we have.  The alternative is slavery for all.  It is imperative that we take back the House of Representatives in November 2010.  We look towards our future and forward to your allegiance.